Understanding ConCourt Rulings On Prenup Signed After Civil or Customary Marriage

For years, there has been a misunderstanding among couples about prenuptial agreements signed after lobola has been paid. In a recent Constitutional Court ruling, it was confirmed that prenuptial agreements signed after a civil or customary marriage has already taken place are invalid.
The ruling was delivered on Wednesday, 21 January 2026, following a case brought by VVC and JRM. The couple were married in 2011 under customary law in community of property and later entered into a civil marriage.
The court ruled that when people who are already married under customary law later enter into a civil marriage with each other, the civil marriage does not cancel or end the customary marriage. Instead, it subsumes it.
What does this mean?
- Couples will not be able to change their matrimonial property system simply by signing a contract once they are already married, whether under customary or civil law. The existing property regime remains valid unless changed through a court-approved process.
- A prenuptial agreement must be signed before any lobola is paid or before a civil marriage is conducted.
- Couples who wish to change their property regime after marriage must apply to court for approval.
Leave a Comment